Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis
AIMS Central venous catheter access in an acute setting can be a challenge given underlying disease and risk for venous thrombosis. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are commonly placed but limit sites for fistula creation in patients with chronic renal failure (CKD). The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of venous thrombosis from small bore internal jugular (...
متن کاملRisk factors for venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters.
To evaluate the risk factors associated with an increased risk of symptomatic peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC)-related venous thrombosis. Retrospective analyses identified 2313 patients who received PICCs from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013. All 11 patients with symptomatic PICC-related venous thrombosis (thrombosis group) and 148 who did not have thromboses (non-thrombo...
متن کاملCentral venous catheters.
Central venous catheterisation was first performed in 1929when Werner Frossman, a German doctor, inserted a ureteric catheter into his antecubital vein. He then walked to the radiography department so that the catheter could be guided into his right ventricle using fluoroscopy. Since then, central venous access has become amainstay of modern clinical practice. An estimated 200 000 central venou...
متن کاملDeep vein thrombosis associated with central venous catheters - a review.
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are frequently used in patients for a variety of indications such as cancer treatment, diagnostic monitoring, parenteral nutrition, hemodialysis, cardiac pacing, and administration of fluids, blood products or medication [1]. The benefit derived from a CVC may be offset by thrombosis and associated complications, such as pulmonary embolism (PE), CVC dysfunction, ...
متن کاملRemoval of central venous catheters.
incidences in the landmark group of carotid artery puncture (10.6%), hemothorax (1.7%), and pneumothorax (2.4%) greater than most anesthesiologists would accept. Thus it is not surprising that meta-analysis of these disparate studies (which have not been scored by traditional methods to assess for bias and scientific rigor) would find statistical significance only in success of line insertion. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Clinical Nephrology
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0301-0430
DOI: 10.5414/cn108347